Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1224

reference
741-tree-1
name
1224
tree-preservation-order

undefined

741-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.007522 50.886530)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.007451 50.886523,-1.007454 50.886537,-1.007464 50.886549,-1.007479 50.886559,-1.007499 50.886566,-1.007521 50.886568,-1.007543 50.886566,-1.007563 50.886560,-1.007579 50.886550,-1.007589 50.886538,-1.007593 50.886524,-1.007590 50.886510,-1.007580 50.886497,-1.007564 50.886487,-1.007545 50.886481,-1.007523 50.886478,-1.007501 50.886480,-1.007481 50.886486,-1.007465 50.886496,-1.007454 50.886509,-1.007451 50.886523)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL